With 12 years of experience, I’ve navigated diverse challenges — applying best practices that place people at the center.
When automakers like Ford, Honda, or Chevy builds a vehicle, the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) assigns a unique VIN, which becomes the key identifier in all digital records. Dealers rely on Cox Automotive’s Vehicle Inventory Platform (CVIP)—the system behind tools like vAuto, AutoTrader, and Dealer.com—to manage, market, and sell their inventory. Every vehicle record contains 500+ data points, all tied to that VIN.
But when supply chain disruptions hit and inventory dries up, dealers suffer. To keep sales flowing, OEMs provide pre-VIN records—digital placeholders for future vehicles that haven’t been built yet.
The Problem? CVIP can’t properly handle pre-VIN records. Since the system depends on VINs (consistent unique identifiers), dealers are forced to use manual workarounds or external tools, creating inefficiencies and lost sales opportunities.
The Solution? Upgrade CVIP to support pre-VIN vehicles. Easy right? However extensive discovery would be needed to determine the solution and with so many competing tech priorities, leadership asks: Why invest in this? How does the lack of pre-VIN support impact dealers business? What is the effort
> Researched the problem
> Co-extracted insights
> Visualized the pain points
> Framed the problem
> Form the solution narrative
> Product Directory
> Platform Architect
> UX Architect
> B2B UX Strategy
> 9 Months
Being the UX Architect for the platform product team, I lead the problem discovery research to demonstrate how the lack of pre-VIN support in CVIP impacted our dealer customers.
Through research based storytelling, leadership approved additional funding for PreVIN support, representing a $1.2 million opportunity in yearly revenue.
I conducted research and interviews with those closest to the problem, dealer customers, and those who where the key to the solution platform leadership and architects. Then, through collaborative sessions with the team and using an Affinity Clustering method, we drew insights from the information collected in the research.
Inventory Managers overseeing all aspects of vehicle inventory; acquiring inventory, ensuring optimal stock levels, and maximizing dealership profitability.
Objective:
Capture the pain points caused by the lack of pre-VIN support in CVIP.
Insights:
Composed of Sr. Directors and Principal Architects, these where minds behind the curtain who knew exactly why CVIP couldn’t handle pre-VIN records today.
Objective:
Understand the barriers and effort for supporting pre-VIN
Insights:
I reached out to our Enterprise Insights and Advisory Director, who explained the problem from a high-level. It was not just the lack of pre-VIN support causing pain for dealers but the market conditions.
Objective:
Streamlined export setup processes and minimal troubleshooting time.
Insights:
The technical pre-VIN problem was two fold: without decoding the record is incomplete thus impacting dealer solutions and with no consistent unique identifier, updating a pre-VIN to a valid VIN was impossible.
Extracts the official specs of the vehicle that the OEM submits to NHTSA. It is a form of independent verification to protect consumers from misinformation.
Problem tree analysis uncovered three root causes of low sales and CSAT. Since OEMs prioritize high-performing dealers, this creates a vicious cycle: poor performance → fewer allocations → worse performance.
Placing context around the dealer pain points was instrumental in demonstrating the impact to their business in the typical vehicle acquisition to sales lifecycle.
The technical pre-VIN problem was two fold: without decoding the record is incomplete thus impacting dealer solutions and with no consistent unique identifier, updating a pre-VIN to a valid VIN was impossible. Here’s a high-level data flow explanation.
Between ordering and receiving vehicles, dealers lost the opportunity to market and generate leads that secure deposits.
When a customer places a lead on a vehicle yet to be built (pre-VIN), the system cannot match it to the valid VIN when it becomes available, requiring the dealer to do it manually.
Without a unique identifier connecting pre-VIN to the valid VIN, the dealer’s CRM does not trigger sold-follow ups to ensure the customer is happy with their purchase.
We presented the research findings with supporting artifacts. Then, I brought it to life by telling the story of how market forces brought the demand for pre-VIN to our doorstep, creating pain for dealers. More importantly, preVIN support is a must-have safety feature that provides essential support for dealer customers when unpredictable market forces impact inventory.
Pre-VIN support would require OEMs to provide a persistent unique identifier for record updates and the VIN decoding dependency to be mitigated.
The experience map demonstrates how investing in pre-VIN support would turn dealer pain points into benefits.
With preVIN support in Cox Auto dealer solutions, dealers can attain benefits thanks to working workflows that maximize business during times of low inventory.
Right away, dealers are able market and merchandise their pre-VIN inventory. This increases the likelihood of a sale by maximizing their lead time.
Leads for pre-VIN vehicles are matched automatically to valid VIN vehicles, thanks to a unique identifier.
Decreasing the likelihood of receiving negative CSAT that impacts inventory allocations and thus inventory volume.
I sent 20+ interview requests—zero responses. So, I tapped a senior researcher and a dealer performance manager to help with recruiting.
Conducting dealer interviews independently streamlined discovery but created a disconnect with product and engineering.
The qualitative findings lacked quantitative data showing the prevalence of each issue.
–
Collaboration during discovery to arrive at the same conclusions ensured a holistic understanding of the problem, reducing siloed decision-making.
–
Using affinity mapping, problem trees, and experience maps helped stakeholders grasp the issue quickly and align on priorities.
–
Presenting findings as a narrative made the problem relatable, ensuring stakeholder buy-in for the solution.